In a surprising annoucement last week, the Department of Education made public that they are proposing to scrap the BREEAM requirements for all new build schools, from primary schools, free schools and the largest Academies for the new Priorities School Programme discussed in a previous blog. This comes shortly after the Environment Secretary Chris Huhne’s proposed cutting of the so called Feed In Tarriffs (FITs) for solar panel pvs was ruled unlawful by the European Union.
As outlined in our Green Zone, BREEAM has been something of a pre-requisite benchmark accepted by all stakeholders for all new build public sector developments and having spoken to many architects and specifiers, it is known to be a long-winded process, putting it mildly, with cost implications the Government is now apparently ceasing upon to justify its intentions.
Whilst it is entirely understandable that the Government has to look at any way possible to reduce costs, the question of this blog would appear a valid one: how committed are they for making the United Kingdom a “greener” country? Besides its wind farms (which despite being extremely expensive and cost-inaffective, Mr Huhne appears set upon building across the sea and areas of natural beauty) there certainly seems to be a less than enthusiastic committment from them. FITs would surely continue to encourage people to change from traditional energy to solar panel pvs and despite its faults, BREEAM at least sets a green standard all new builds have to obtain. So, as the latest Construction News (260112) front cover pertently enquires: ” “Costs versus Carbon” discuss.” What’s it to be then Coalition?
We welcome any comments and will publish these here so long as they are directly relevant to this blog and topic.
